Skip to main content

Demo Against Mark T. Hall, Insurance Lawyer at Morgan, Melhuish & Abrutyn. Livingston, New Jersey. Animal Cruelty. Vendetta Killing.

An all points bulletin from Showing Animals Respect and Kindness (SHARK) and the Animal Protection League of New Jersey (APLNJ)...

There will be a demonstration on Thursday, Feb. 2nd, 11am, at the law offices of Morgan, Melhuish & Abrutyn. The exact address is 651 West Mount Pleasant Avenue, Suite 200, Livingston, New Jersey 07039. Bring yourself, your friends, and your signs.
Please spread the word on the demo and continue to discuss and disseminate information about this egregious case of animal abuse on your blogs and social networking sites. This is only the first of the many planned demos. If you have any questions, you can contact Stuart Chaifetz at

The protest will be against Mark T. Hall , an insurance lawyer for the law firm of Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn. The firm has offices in both Livingston and Manhattan. Hall practices out of the Livingston office. See the map above. Why the protest? Well, there is THIS and THAT

In a nutshell, Mark T. Hall, a hunter, promised his buddies a revenge killing. He promised that he would kill one black bear ( ended up killing two) to spite a fellow attorney named Doris Lin. Ms. Lin acts as the legal adviser for the APLNJ and SHARK. In behalf of the APLNJ, Ms. Lin filed a law suit last December to stop the 2011 black bear trophy hunt in New Jersey. The court ruled against the APLNJ, and the massacre began on Dec. 5th. If you view the links above, you will see that Mark T. Hall, true to his word, carried out his vendetta by killing a mother bear and her cub. Like an immature child, Mark T. Hall followed this up with anonymous online taunts at Ms. Lin and disparaging remarks about female members of the Bear Group at SHARK's website. His true identity was later determined.


I spoke to a friend of mine, himself a hunter like Hall, and he vehemently disapproved of Hall's conduct and mentality. My friend described Hall's actions as " highly unbecoming of a responsible hunter." "Thug-like," he said. "One does not kill an animal to spite, or ridicule, someone who just happens to disagree with you." Although I am not a hunter and opposed to all animal-killing, I knew what he meant about honor among hunters. My friend and I embrace polarized views about hunting, but we still talk. We always disagree, but we find that we still have to respect each other.

Obviously, I know what animal rights advocates think of these killings, but what do other hunting aficionados think? I wanted to hear from more hunters. So, I dropped in at the local outdoor/camping store up the road and asked for their opinions. The guys behind the counter, holding court over glass showcases stocked with guns and ammo, condemned the killings. They stressed that " hunting is not about hate and vengeance." "Those bears were killed not for food nor sport, " a purchaser said. "People like him give us a bad name and it sticks, " another complained. No two ways about it, with heads wagging, their disapproval was unanimous.

So, it seems that Mark T. Hall has become an embarrassment even to his fellow hunters.
Mark T. Hall managed to offend both animal rights advocates and responsible hunters with one shot, actually two.


A full partner at Morgan Melhuish & Abrutyn should be very worried. Years of investment, both personal and financial, years of building a good reputation, can all come down like a house of cards when one of the firm's lawyers engages in a brutal and spiteful act of animal abuse. This onsite demonstration is just the beginning. More bad publicity is surely to follow.

Do these revenge killings not bother his colleagues? I would like to believe that most of the lawyers at Morgan Melhuish & Abrutyn will reject this behavior. Only 1% of NJ's population hunts, and this law firm could very easily be a microcosm of the state. If I were a co-worker, I'd tell Hall to own up to his actions and leave me out of it. I don't know if the higher ups at the firm are aware of this matter. Maybe the protest outside their offices will lead them to ask questions. Letters to the firm have been sent, as well as to their known clients.

This is going to be messy.


Popular posts from this blog

Poem. Captivity, Longing. Cruelty. Misery. Free the Animals.

Thumbing through some Robert Frost poems, I was led to this one by Maya Angelou . I don't know if Frost ever had an influence on Angelou, but certainly any American poet living today would be familiar with Frost's work. Frost and Whitman are my favorite poets, and the romantic poets ( Keats, Byron, and Shelley ) I can't bear. I find their work dense, abstruse and impenetrable. It's just a matter of taste and connectivity. I am no expert on verse, but I will accept the opinion of those who are. They warn us that Frost's poetry is deceivingly simple. If we were to try our hand at it, to put complicated emotions into simple verse, we would be tied up in knots. Anyway, Angelou's poem below, Caged Bird, touches on the plaintive cries, the longing for better things, that captive individuals must go through. You can apply the core meaning or sentiment of this poem to any situation involving imprisonment or captivity, human or animal. Think of the dog in a dank, dark

Philippines. Reporting Animal Cruelty. Emergency Numbers. RA 8485.

Because I belong to an group of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines, I can read the numerous discussions between group members and people who, seems to me, just signed up to make an urgent plea for help. There were two this week who begged for assistance concerning two dogs who were tied up under rain and sun with no food nor water. One was described to be on the verge of a heat stroke. The images that filled my mind disturbed me immensely, but I am also encouraged at the same time. There is a growing number of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines and ordinary citizens are beginning to reject animal cruelty, willing to take personal action against it. Just from this website, I can see from the visitor data that many are seeking information on how to report animal cruelty in the Philippines. You can find my previous post on the subject HERE . Keep in mind that your complaint has legal standing via the Philippine Animal Welfare Act which is also known as the RA 8485 .

Antipolo. Philippines. Dog Fighting. Dan Sy Tan Arraigned.

It looks like the noose is getting tighter around the neck of Dan Sy Tan , the alleged but obviously guilty ring leader of a vicious dogfighting ring in the town of Antipolo, Rizal in the Philippines. He was finally arraigned on June 5, 2008 for his crimes, illegal gambling and violating the Philippine Animal Welfare Act of 1998 . Caught redhanded by undercover cops posing as spectators, Dan Tan and his business associates face overwhelming evidence. Included in the ring are three Thai nationals who fled the country last year. They are on videotape. There are gate receipts, eye witnesses, veterinary statements, all point to their guilt. These guys made money from the blood of fighting dogs. What a way to make a living! It's been a full year since the night of the raid, but we'll take every bit of victory we can get. I say " We " because I am a member of the Philippine Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) who worked with the police to capture these poor excuses for human be