Skip to main content

New Jersey. Bear Hunt. 2010. Public Hearing. Stop the Trophy Hunt.

I am cross posting an alert from the group, Protect New Jersey Bears, regarding the proposed bear hunt at the end of this year. As usual, if it is not kill the deer, it's kill the bears. Further, in Passaic County, Mayor Pat Lapore and the Board of Freeholders are getting ready to do a geese kill plus their eggs. This is the same gang that ordered the deer hunt at Garrett Mountain in February that was ultimately stopped due to irregularities in the tagging of the dead deer. And that hunt was stopped not because Pat Lapore and his cohorts realized it was wrong. The real reason was that the state Division of Fish and Wildlife had begun an investigation into the hunt. New Jersey has a serious empathy deficit when it comes to wild animals, treating them like a nuisance rather than our natural treasures. Now, the bears are in the crosshairs, again.

========================================

Please Attend the Public Hearing and Oppose a 2010 Bear Hunt in New Jersey

Please RSVP here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=112351662121242

Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Time: 6:00pm - 9:00pm
Location: New Jersey State Museum
Street
: 205 West State St.
City/Town: Trenton, NJ
View Map

Description .The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has approved plans for a black bear trophy hunt this December, following a 60-day public comment period.

This is your last chance to oppose the initiation of the first bear hunt in the state since 2005, and only the third bear hunt in the state since 1970.

Please join us in Trenton to voice your opposition to the trophy hunting of bears. You will be given an opportunity to speak at the hearing. We need as many people to show up as possible to demonstrate that the majority of residents oppose the hunt.

Did you know that in New Jersey's previous hunts, trophy hunters were permitted to shoot cubs less than a year of age, as well as mothers with cubs? Cubs would remain with their mothers and often continue to nurse for six months after the proposed hunting season would end.

In the 2003 bear hunt, about one in six bears killed was a cub. In 2005, about one in eight bears killed was a cub.

Did you know that in New Jersey's previous hunts, trophy hunters were permitted to bait bears to their tree stands with piles of food, and shoot them in the back while they were feeding? The US Forest Service, the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management all warn against the feeding of bears because it can result in conflicts with the animals.

Did you know that most conflicts with bears in New Jersey are related to garbage, and that by simply making garbage and other human food sources inaccessuble to bears, most conflicts would be averted? Proper garbage management, enforcement of no-feeding regulations and use of aversive conditioning are the most effective means of reducing problems with bears. Shooting bears at random will not reduce conflicts.

Did you know that hunting will not reduce conflicts with bears? Hunting only provides a temporary population reduction, followed by a population increase. Further, no one has claimed that bears have exceeded their biological carrying capacity in New Jersey.

In 2003, 328 bears were killed by hunters. In 2005, 298 bears were killed. Authorities estimate that more than 400 bears could be killed in 2010.

For more information on the history of New Jersey's bears, please visit our website here: http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/bear_hunting/timelines/new_jerseys_bears_timeline.html.

For more information about why hunting doesn't reduce conflicts with bears, please visit: http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/bear_hunting/facts/bear_hunts_no_solution.html.

For more information about how to reduce conflicts with bears, please visit: http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/bear_hunting/tips/bear_conflict_resolution.html.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Philippines. Reporting Animal Cruelty. Emergency Numbers. RA 8485.

Because I belong to an group of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines, I can read the numerous discussions between group members and people who, seems to me, just signed up to make an urgent plea for help. There were two this week who begged for assistance concerning two dogs who were tied up under rain and sun with no food nor water. One was described to be on the verge of a heat stroke. The images that filled my mind disturbed me immensely, but I am also encouraged at the same time. There is a growing number of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines and ordinary citizens are beginning to reject animal cruelty, willing to take personal action against it. Just from this website, I can see from the visitor data that many are seeking information on how to report animal cruelty in the Philippines. You can find my previous post on the subject HERE . Keep in mind that your complaint has legal standing via the Philippine Animal Welfare Act which is also known as the RA 8485 ....

William Baber, Tennessee Vet Gone Bad.

Euthanasia is suppose to be merciful. When William Baber had his way, it was far from it. Baber used the very cruel " heart stick " method minus the sedation. This means that the animals could spend as long as 30 agonizing minutes before death actually occurred. Undercover video showed that William Baber even stepped on the animals to immobilize them for the injection. Do I sound like I am describing an executioner and not a veterinarian? Very sad, isn't it? The video showed dogs’ tails visibly wagging and cats are flailing before they’re given the lethal injection . "It’s just a horrible, horrible way for an animal to die,” said former euthanasia technician June McMahon. Tennessian.com reported that " still conscious, the cats were described by inmates as 'going wild' after being placed in a container, with as many as 10-15 of them being dumped on top of each other in a 'cruel manner,' authorities allege.These animals were allegedly placed ...

Philippines. Committee on Animal Welfare. Tambucho Gassing. Oscar Macenas. Fight for Compassion, Not Cruelty.

Believe it or not, the Committee on Animal Welfare (CAW) is again pushing for the reinstatement of Tambucho Gassing as an accepted form of euthanasia in the Philippines. This comes after CAW dragged its feet from August 2010 to April 2011, stultifying a directive from Secretary Proceso Alcala of the Department of Agriculture to rewrite a previous CAW-endorsed administrative order that embraced Tambucho Gassing like it was a God-sent cure-all for stray or unwanted animals. For those coming into this matter only now, Tambucho Gassing is not carbon monoxide gassing as CAW would like the world to believe. Tambucho Gassing is death by vehicular exhaust fumes. No gas cylinders are used, just a rubber hose connected to a clunky, old, usually badly tuned gas engine. The animals are entombed in a sealed metal container and toxic fumes are pumped into it. In terms of expediency, the process is slow, inefficient, and ineffective against the problem. In terms of humanity, it is depraved, utterly c...