Skip to main content

PAWS & the Earth Island Institute Protesting Dolphin Show at Metrowalk

The Philippine Animal Welfare Society and the Earth Island Institute (EII) will conduct a peaceful demonstration against an Indonesian-based dolphin show this Sunday, Dec. 9, 2007. This is not the first time they are going against this particular show. Here's more information:

"Dear animal advocates and friends,After our Christmas Get-Together on Saturday (3pm -PARC), PAWS is set to hold a peaceful picket on December 9, Sunday at Metrowalk in Ortigas and distribute flyers in front of the Dolphin Show entrance there.Please join us:

WHAT: Information- dissemination campaign-
WHY: People Shouldn't Watch Dolphin Shows
ACTIVITY: Flyering
WHEN: December 9 (Sunday) - 10 am to 11am ( New Time : 12:30pm - 2pm )
WHERE: in front of the "Wonderful World of Dolphins with Sea Lions" Metro walk Complex, Meralco Avenue Pasig City, Metrowalk, Ortigas

The organizers of this show are the same organizers of last year's show at SM Mall of Asia - Movers and Shakers- which we protested against.Both SM MOA and Movers & Shakers promised not to hold the show again since their "eyes were just opened" to the cruelty endured by these dolphins in such a show.

SM kept its promise, MOVERS & SHAKERS DID NOT.

Armchair activists may choose to make a polite phone call to the numbers indicated below to tell them (politely again) about how you feel about wild animals being used for entertainment; or fax a message to Movers & Shakers President, Eva Nono, requesting cancellation of the show in the name of Corporate Social Responsibility. 384-5432, 384-5327, 0916-9845255. Together, we can all make difference for dolphins.The less people watch these cruel dolphin shows, the more dolphins will be free in the wild.-The Philippine Animal Welfare Society (PAWS)"If you care about dolphins, don't watch dolphin shows."Join the picket. Help make this world a better place.

Further Reading...

Earth Island Institute-Philippines:

BANNED ENTERTAINMENT FINDS ITS WAY IN THE PHILIPPINES: While many countries are doing away with inhumane entertainment such as traveling dolphin shows, it is ironic that in the Philippines, these are treated with novelty. Packaged as “family entertainment”, performing dolphins in traveling shows are given cute names and made to perform seemingly witty tricks. What the audience does not know is that these animals are starved to obey their trainers, repeatedly subjected to the stress of transport and made to swim in chlorinated water that will blind the animals over time. Differentiated from the bigger and more expensive ocean parks, traveling dolphin shows are smaller and are actually temporary facilities where marine mammals, usually dolphins and sea lions, perform for a period of time after which they are moved to their next show location. The repeated transport of dolphins and other aquatic animals are particularly stressful as these animals have to be immobilized for the entire duration of the travel. If transporting terrestrial animals in circuses like lions, tigers and elephants is hard, it is even harder for aquatic animals as they have to be taken out of the water and completely immobilized. In the wild, dolphins never stop moving. They are always swimming, and any restriction on this movement is very stressful for the animal. Most dolphins that are subject to repeated transport develop bruises along their pectoral fins when they are carried and immobilized in hammocks. Dolphin experts such as Richard O’Barry (the former trainer of ‘Flipper’, the hit TV series of the 60s) confirm that dolphins actually die in the process of being transported. The inferior facilities of traveling shows—shallow pools, inappropriate water treatment methods and the stress of the repeated transport of the animals have actually moved countries like the United States to ban this type of show. Many other countries in Europe like the United Kingdom have also banned such shows. Latin American countries such as Brazil and Nicaragua have stopped the commercial showing of dolphins and Australia and New Zealand have also prohibited such entertainment in their territories.

NO GOVERNMENT STANDARDS: In the Philippines, there are no specific standards for the welfare of performing animals such as marine mammals. The Bureau of Animal Industry, (BAI), the government agency tasked to implement the Animal Welfare Act (RA 8485), does not have the experience, technical expertise and standards to evaluate dolphin shows. Worse, lobbying by environmental and animal welfare groups to adopt standards are all but ignored by BAI officials. Earth Island Institute-Philippines, an environmental organization working for the protection of dolphins in the Philippines has been lobbying at the BAI for years. They believe that government officials do not even know the issues behind traveling dolphin shows and do not know that these are already banned in many countries.

QUESTIONABLE EDUCATIONAL VALUE: Many groups actually question the educational value of dolphin shows. A growing number of educators and marine mammal experts believe that dolphin shows actually promote the “miseducation” of people on the actual lives of marine mammals such as dolphins and sea lions. In the wild, dolphins rarely approach humans, spend 80% of their time underwater diving at depths, and never associate with sea lions which are their natural enemies. The show being put on by the “Wonderful World of Dolphins” actually negates this natural behavior and life of these marine mammals.

AN APPEAL TO END CRUELTY: Both EII-Phils and PAWS urge the general public to look beyond the ‘cute’ image used as fronts by dolphin shows and see the cruelty that these animals have to endure for human amusement. They urge the general public to stop animal cruelty by refraining from patronizing such shows. These groups hope that one day the Philippines will join the ranks of the countries that have abandoned cruelty in their entertainment industry."




The Prison Pool...Dolphins live naturally in the Oceans w/o Chlorine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Philippines. Reporting Animal Cruelty. Emergency Numbers. RA 8485.

Because I belong to an group of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines, I can read the numerous discussions between group members and people who, seems to me, just signed up to make an urgent plea for help. There were two this week who begged for assistance concerning two dogs who were tied up under rain and sun with no food nor water. One was described to be on the verge of a heat stroke. The images that filled my mind disturbed me immensely, but I am also encouraged at the same time. There is a growing number of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines and ordinary citizens are beginning to reject animal cruelty, willing to take personal action against it. Just from this website, I can see from the visitor data that many are seeking information on how to report animal cruelty in the Philippines. You can find my previous post on the subject HERE . Keep in mind that your complaint has legal standing via the Philippine Animal Welfare Act which is also known as the RA 8485 .

Three Members of the Philippine Shooting Team and the Killing of Protected Philippine Wildlife

When a member of the animal or plant kingdom goes extinct, there will be no second chances. Evolution will simply not repeat itself. There are reportedly eighty bird species that are unique to the Philippines and many of them have already made it to the endangered list. And we, to a great extent, have indiscrimate hunting to thank for it. In spite of two national laws protecting Philippine animals, the carnage continues unabated. The killings could occur as arbitrarily as guys getting together for macho time, or as a result of a well-planned hunting trip involving speed boats, bird callers, and camouflaged outfits. Either way, the outcome is the same. Philippine wildlife, our natural treasures, inches closer to a state of irreparable vacancy. Not too long ago, we learned about the Bacolod Air Rifle Club (BARC) whose unbridled killing of Philippine birds and ducks became the subject of an online petition calling for immediate government intervention. My post on that most disturbing c

Movie Oro. Dog Cruelty. Alvin Yapan. Mark Shandii Bacolod. Friends for the Protection of Animals.

Position Statement on Oro The Friends for the Protection of Animals are opposed to the use of any animal for the purposes of entertainment, labor, experimentation, or as captive exhibits. We believe in their natural born rights to freedom and an unencumbered life, rights that are no less valuable or unalienable as our rights as humans. In this light, we condemn the bludgeoning death of a dog, perhaps two as alleged by an insider, for dramatic purposes in the film, Oro. We a bhor the insensitivity of the cast and crew whose apathy to an animal's suffering, coupled with their desire for personal glory and industry recognition, moved us to ponder just how deep can human depravity sink. We question their responsibility to decency and compassion which evidently they heeded to cinematic expediency. Reported responses to the press reveal that there was never any compunction to do so. We consider the killings to be a violation of the Animal Welfare Act which prohibits cruel and exp