Skip to main content

IAMS. Pet Food Giant. Animal Cruelty in Its Laboratory.

Well, once again, PETA, through its undercover work, has been proven that the emperor has no clothes. IAMS, a pet food company who claims that they care about your pet, in reality, doesn't care a hoot about animal welfare. A boycott of its products is the least an animal-loving consumer can do. For those of us on a more aggressive footing, we can spread the news, spread the video, join the demonstrations when planned, and personally inform other consumers at the pet supply store about IAMS' skeleton in the closet.

Here's the case: The U.S. Department of Agriculture issued an official complaint against a contract laboratory for IAMS based on reports by government inspectors and an undercover investigation by PETA in 2002 and 2003. The government's main thrust is that this company “has shown a lack of good faith.” The government complaint alleges that the following violations:

1) Failure to provide pain relief to sheep used in experiments that caused pain or distress
2) Failure to ensure that personnel were trained to perform experiments on animals
3) Failure to provide veterinary care and to observe animals daily
4) Failure to properly ventilate housing facilities for dogs and cats
5) Failure to house cats with a sufficient number of litterboxes and resting surfaces
6) Failure to keep animal-housing facilities clean and in good repair, resulting in injuries
7) Failure to maintain comfortable temperatures in animal-housing facilities
8) Failure to provide animals with sufficient space


IAMS, what a shame, what a farce! This is like an animal welfare advocate who beats his own dog, like the priest who sermons on a Sunday and then steals the collection basket, like a cop who drinks and drive. Can we trust anyone anymore in this world? Here's a quote from PETA's website about the undercover investigation:

" For nearly 10 months in 2002 and early 2003, a PETA investigator went undercover at an Iams contract testing laboratory, where a dark, sordid secret was discovered beneath the dog- and cat-food manufacturer’s wholesome image. Our investigator found dogs who had gone crazy from intense confinement in barren steel cages and cement cells, dogs who had been left on a filthy paint-chipped floor after chunks of muscle had been hacked from their thighs, dogs who had been surgically debarked, and horribly sick dogs and cats who were languishing in their cages, neglected and left to suffer without veterinary care. "

Need more reinforcement, let's watch the video:




People to write to:


Jeffrey P. Ansell, President Iams Company
7250 Poe Ave.Dayton, OH 45414-58011
800-675-3849
937-898-7387
customer.service@iams.com

A.G. Lafley
Chairman of the Board and CEOProcter & Gamble
1 Procter & Gamble PlazaCincinnati, OH 452021-
800-543-1745
513-983-9369 (fax)
http://www.pg.com/

Bill Miller
Director of Sales Iams Canada
920 Gana Ct.Mississauga, ON L5S 1Z41
800-658-5657 (press 5 for the name directory)
905-565-4711 (fax)

Managing Director
Iams UK Ltd.Procter & Gamble
The Heights, Brooklands Weybridge
Surrey KT13 0XPUK: +44 (0)808 100 7010

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sickening. The banging of the cages and the sounds of the dogs wailing brought back memories of my *toxicology days*. It was a wave of nausea and I tossed my lunch.
Ted Teodoro said…
Sorry bout your lunch. I found it painful to hear the sounds and to watch that dog circle endlessly in its cage. To realize that no one is coming to its immediate rescue made me bow my head in sadness. Who are these people who can work there and come home to a loving family and a comfortable bed?
Anonymous said…
Because they are like what I was 20years ago. They believe in their work. They believe the safety of the world depends on their research. One day, a pair of eyes looks at you and you can hear its voice "I know who you are and I know what you are." You're not likely to ever forget that kind of shock.

Popular posts from this blog

Philippines. Reporting Animal Cruelty. Emergency Numbers. RA 8485.

Because I belong to an group of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines, I can read the numerous discussions between group members and people who, seems to me, just signed up to make an urgent plea for help. There were two this week who begged for assistance concerning two dogs who were tied up under rain and sun with no food nor water. One was described to be on the verge of a heat stroke. The images that filled my mind disturbed me immensely, but I am also encouraged at the same time. There is a growing number of animal welfare advocates in the Philippines and ordinary citizens are beginning to reject animal cruelty, willing to take personal action against it. Just from this website, I can see from the visitor data that many are seeking information on how to report animal cruelty in the Philippines. You can find my previous post on the subject HERE . Keep in mind that your complaint has legal standing via the Philippine Animal Welfare Act which is also known as the RA 8485 .

Three Members of the Philippine Shooting Team and the Killing of Protected Philippine Wildlife

When a member of the animal or plant kingdom goes extinct, there will be no second chances. Evolution will simply not repeat itself. There are reportedly eighty bird species that are unique to the Philippines and many of them have already made it to the endangered list. And we, to a great extent, have indiscrimate hunting to thank for it. In spite of two national laws protecting Philippine animals, the carnage continues unabated. The killings could occur as arbitrarily as guys getting together for macho time, or as a result of a well-planned hunting trip involving speed boats, bird callers, and camouflaged outfits. Either way, the outcome is the same. Philippine wildlife, our natural treasures, inches closer to a state of irreparable vacancy. Not too long ago, we learned about the Bacolod Air Rifle Club (BARC) whose unbridled killing of Philippine birds and ducks became the subject of an online petition calling for immediate government intervention. My post on that most disturbing c

Movie Oro. Dog Cruelty. Alvin Yapan. Mark Shandii Bacolod. Friends for the Protection of Animals.

Position Statement on Oro The Friends for the Protection of Animals are opposed to the use of any animal for the purposes of entertainment, labor, experimentation, or as captive exhibits. We believe in their natural born rights to freedom and an unencumbered life, rights that are no less valuable or unalienable as our rights as humans. In this light, we condemn the bludgeoning death of a dog, perhaps two as alleged by an insider, for dramatic purposes in the film, Oro. We a bhor the insensitivity of the cast and crew whose apathy to an animal's suffering, coupled with their desire for personal glory and industry recognition, moved us to ponder just how deep can human depravity sink. We question their responsibility to decency and compassion which evidently they heeded to cinematic expediency. Reported responses to the press reveal that there was never any compunction to do so. We consider the killings to be a violation of the Animal Welfare Act which prohibits cruel and exp